|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Namespace terminology
A.3 of the namespace spec also uses the term *expanded form* along with *expanded element type* and *expanded attribute type* in an attempt to explain the relationship between a local part and a namespace name in different contexts. See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#ns-expnames. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Lars Marius Garshol [mailto:larsga@g...] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:40 PM To: xml-dev@l... Subject: Re: Namespace terminology * Evan Lenz | | I like the term used by the XPath 1.0 spec: "expanded-name" (or, | depending on your naming convention of choice, "expanded_name", | etc.) Yes, that works. The definition fits very closely, it appears in an official document, and the connection between the name and what it signifies is pretty logical. * Tim Bray | | Universal names? Unames? Not as logical as exanded name, but if it had been in official use I think I would have accepted it. I prefer expanded name, though. Thanks a lot, both of you! -- Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian <URL: http://www.ontopia.net > ISO SC34/WG3, OASIS GeoLang TC <URL: http://www.garshol.priv.no > ----------------------------------------------------------------- The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








