Re: Traditional RPC
On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 09:21, Paul Prescod wrote: > "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" wrote: > > The popularity wasn't based on the protocol. > > It's just a theory. > > 1. My theory is that protocols will get chosen because they work > properly. Hey, something I can agree with Paul about! > 2. Your theory is that they will get chosen because they ship with MSDN > and other vendor-backed distributions. > > 3. Dave's seems to be that they will get chosen because they are popular > with end-users and surrounded by hype and excitement. 2 and 3 are useful pluses for protocol success, but I don't think either inherently reduces the risk of a popular but poorly implemented protocol creating an enormous mess. On the bright side, more pain MIGHT mean more people willing to put the time in to fix that pain. There's got to be a balance point there somewhere... > Obviously I subscribe to my theory. Heh. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format