[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms

• To: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
• Subject: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 05:49:56 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20020201075014.01cd41f0@p...> fromSean McGrath at "Feb 1, 2002 07:52:23 am"

Sean McGrath scripsit:

> Mind game: Imagine a UML tool where all classes are instances of a single
> uber-class with an attribute called "type". Feeling queasy yet? Try 
> Smalltalk:-)

Why, it's easy:  Object has no superclass, and the class of Metaclass-class
is Metaclass.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@c...
To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all.  There
are no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language
that they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful.
        --_The Hobbit_

• References:
  • RE: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Next by Date: Re: life support for DTDs? was RE: misprocessing namespaces)
• Previous by thread: RE: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Next by thread: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread