[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses

• To: "ext Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>, ext Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@a...>, ext Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>, XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses
• From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@n...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:38:09 +0200
• In-reply-to: <2C61CCE8A870D211A523080009B94E4306FEE8D7@HQ5>
• User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1309

On 2002-02-20 16:32, "ext Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
wrote:

> And that brings one back round to the concept of the
> PUBLIC id.  Why shouldn't PUBLIC ids be used in
> namespace name values?

You can use urn:publicid:

> Because they aren't resolvable
> without the catalog.

There's no doubt that we need name to location mapping,
similar to SGML Catalogs -- and that is what RDDL can
offer in the short term and DDDS and similar technologies
in the long term, with additional knowledge about the
resources provided by SW solutions.

Patrick


--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@n...

• References:
  • RE: Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses
• Next by Date: RE: RE: SOAP-RPC and REST and security
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses
• Next by thread: Re: Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread