|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XPointer crisis
On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 12:40, Christian Nentwich wrote: > > > XLink is going to stay listless until there's some version of > > XPointer, that's for sure. > > XLink works fine for a lot of things without XPointer. Tucking an XPath > at the end of a link suits us well enough (see http://www.xlinkit.com). > > Perhaps XLink would have been served better if it had used XPath > initially and left XPointer as a future improvement. That might not be difficult within the existing framework. Keep the xmlns() scheme around, and use an xpath() scheme rather than xpointer(). Gutting XPointer so it defines bare names and an extensible scheme framework seems to me like a good idea. XPointer's current flavor could be one scheme, or even the (I think) friendlier TEI-like form that came before. > It doesn't help that most developers consider ranges a nightmare. Implementing XPath for MOE isn't going to be difficult. Implementing ranges is a whole other beast. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








