[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: URIs are simply names was:Re:"Abstract"URIs

• To: ext Manos Batsis <m.batsis@b...>, XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: URIs are simply names was:Re:"Abstract"URIs
• From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@n...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 15:46:08 +0200
• In-reply-to: <E657D8576967CF448D6AF22CB42DD2690FF20F@e...>
• User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1309

On 2002-02-19 16:59, "ext Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...> wrote:


> Take RDF for example, (AFAIK and even worse, last time I checked) where
> literals cannot be subjects in a sentence (triple). This essentially has
> to do with the RDF model; a literal there is just that; what if the
> system was able to uniquely identify this literal and refer to it with a
> *unique* URI; all implemented features applicable to resources would be
> available for literals as well.

I don't see the point. Do you wish to talk about an occurrence
of a literal? A concrete example would help.

> This brings up some thoughts (and a problem) but this is the wrong
> list...

Please share them either offline or point us to the right list.

Cheers,

Patrick 

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@n...

• References:
  • RE: URIs are simply names was:Re:"Abstract"URIs
    • From: "Manos Batsis" <m.batsis@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Xerces2.0.0 Parser
• Next by Date: Re: Re: [namespaceDocument-8] 14 Theses
• Previous by thread: Re: URIs are simply names was:Re:"Abstract"URIs
• Next by thread: RE: URIs are simply names was:Re:"Abstract"URIs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread