|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - February, 2003
- XML Catalog support for .Net (and others),
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: XML - Disruptive Technology,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- XML - Disruptive Technology,
Doug Ransom
- Namespaces conformance tests,
Karl Waclawek
- Having to programmically create XML Schema, is there a better way that just using the Document Object Model,
Bill Riegel
- getting undisered results , when trying to display japanese characters,
asim
- Markup: The Early Years,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Unicode With Angle Brackets,
Dare Obasanjo
- XML Parsers,
Michael Hoffman
- trying to convert Java Date to/from the XML Schema dataTime datatype.,
Bill Riegel
- The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP],
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?,
Matthew.Bennett
- Problematical scenarios,
Matthew.Bennett
- Joint whitepaper on XML, SOAP, and Binary Data,
Mike Champion
- RE: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: XML for the Restaurant Industry,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- XML for the Restaurant Industry,
Samuel Dorfman
- New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition,
Henry S. Thompson
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Simon St.Laurent
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- Registered Namespace prefixes,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: collisions (was The subsetting has begun),
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Xpath & conditional filters,
David Higgins
- RE: On permathreads,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xm l-dev] The subsetting has begun),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- special characters,
monica.coelho
- Call for information about XML-Fragments,
MASSIMILIANO GRANDI
- [ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-02-25,
Tech Support
- Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Matthew.Bennett
- re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Message not available
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
J.Pietschmann
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Mike Champion
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
David Megginson
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Tim Bray
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Mike Champion
- Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Robin Berjon
- Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Miles Sabin
- Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Robin Berjon
- Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Matt
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
W. E. Perry
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
W. E. Perry
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Tahir Hashmi
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric Snell
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Dennis Sosnoski
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re: Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Mike Champion
- Unicode With Angle Brackets,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Unicode With Angle Brackets,
W. E. Perry
- Re: Unicode With Angle Brackets,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re: Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
W. E. Perry
- Re: Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????),
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Tahir Hashmi
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Tahir Hashmi
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
John Cowan
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: DOM support in IE vs. NS,
Joshua Allen
- Does IE 6.0 support XML Schema validation when displaying selected XML files,
Bill Riegel
- RE: Parsing Performance,
Bill Riegel
- DOM support in IE vs. NS,
Ken Sall
- No Standard Before Its Time (WAS RE: Parsing Performance),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Could someone give a precise definition to these terms and the relationships between them?,
Collin
- XML for RFCs,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Transformation Error , PLZ HELP,
asim
- Transformation Error , PLZ HELP,
asim
- SAX Adapter Framework - New Open Source Project,
Mark Priest
- Re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
AndrewWatt2000
- xml/xsl won't display when used online,
James Rayner
- The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Tim Bray
- Re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Don Bate
- RE: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Don Park
- <Possible follow-ups>
- re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Sean McGrath
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Tim Bray
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Mike Champion
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Miles Sabin
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- [ANN] Montreal information for Extreme 2003,
Sam Hunting
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
John Cowan
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Mike Champion
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Mark Baker
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Lauren Wood
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Sean McGrath
- Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: XQuery and SQL Server Yukon,
Dare Obasanjo
- XQuery and SQL Server Yukon,
Charles White
- nillable keyrefs in XSD,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- RE: RE: Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Jon.Ellis
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Amelia A.Lewis
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Evan Lenz
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Daniel Veillard
- The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Mike Champion
- Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: Thesubsetting has begun),
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsettinghas begun),
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: Thesubsetting has begun),
Mike Champion
- Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: Thesubsetting has begun),
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Daniel Veillard
- Re: The waterfall model lives?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: The waterfall model lives?,
Mike Champion
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Fredrik Lindgren
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Dennis Sosnoski
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- FW: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Mike Champion
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- pure XML syntax tools,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Joe English
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Tim Bray
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Rich Salz
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: Thesubsetting has begun),
Mike Champion
- Re: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Robin Berjon
- Re: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: ,
John Cowan
- Re: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: The subsetting has begun),
Ian Graham
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Rich Salz
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Joshua Allen
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Sean McGrath
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Sean McGrath
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Joe English
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
- Message not available
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Dare Obasanjo
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: The subsetting has begun,
Sean McGrath
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: The subsetting has begun,
Sean McGrath
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Jeff Lowery
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Mike Champion
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Kian-Tat Lim
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Tim Bray
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Wendell Piez
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
W. E. Perry
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: The subsetting has begun,
Jeff Lowery
MSXML4 : how to select a element with namespace prefix,
Anuga Laxmi Kanth Reddy
The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Mike Champion
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Gregory Murphy
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
David Megginson
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Martin Soukup
- Parsing Performance,
David Megginson
- RE: Parsing Performance,
Martin Soukup
- Re: Parsing Performance,
Bill de hÓra
- RE: Parsing Performance,
David Megginson
- RE: Parsing Performance,
Martin Soukup
- RE: Parsing Performance,
David Megginson
- Re: Parsing Performance,
Dennis Sosnoski
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- More on Parsing Performance,
David Megginson
- Re: More on Parsing Performance,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Berend de Boer
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Martin Soukup
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Martin Soukup
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Mike Champion
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
John Cowan
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Bill Kearney
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Norman Walsh
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- RE: The subsetting has begun,
Cavnar-Johnson, John
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: The subsetting has begun,
Simon St.Laurent
COLAG Version 2.0,
Rahul Jain
Re: Open Source or Else,
AndrewWatt2000
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: Open Source or Else,
AndrewWatt2000
- RE: Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Open Source or Else,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
data input to an XSL produced page -- best practices,
Enoch Root
XBRL loan applications [Was: Re:Are the publishing users happy? Why not?],
Ralph Hilken
SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Gregory Murphy
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- RE: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Michael Kay
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Jeff Rafter
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- RE: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Michael Kay
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Richard Tobin
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Gregory Murphy
- Re: SAX Locator vs {start,end}Entity,
Karl Waclawek
RE: Fw: Report to Sender,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Fw: Report to Sender,
Bill Kearney
Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Sean McGrath
Re: XMLDOM Create object problem,
asim
XMLDOM Create object problem,
asim
Historical question about namespaces,
Gustaf Liljegren
"Non-Normative",
Gregory Murphy
RE: Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Re: Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: Google as Big Brother,
Bill Kearney
- RE: Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Google as Big Brother,
Joshua Allen
- RE: Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Google as Big Brother,
Joshua Allen
- RE: Google as Big Brother,
Joshua Allen
Google as Big Brother,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Simon St.Laurent
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Ralph Hilken
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Doug Rudder
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Doug Rudder
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
AndrewWatt2000
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Michael Kay
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
J.Pietschmann
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
Berend de Boer
- RE: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
Michael Kay
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
Berend de Boer
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
Alaric B. Snell
- OT: client vs. server-side validation (was: Are the data users happy? Why not?),
K. Ari Krupnikov
- re: OT: client vs. server-side validation (was: Are the data users happy? Why not?),
David Megginson
- Re: OT: client vs. server-side validation (was: Are the data users happy? Why not?),
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
John Cowan
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
K. Ari Krupnikov
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
John Cowan
- Re: Re: Are the data users happy? Why not?,
J.Pietschmann
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
XForms and XPath 1.0 conformance,
AndrewWatt2000
What is the value of XForms? (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
AndrewWatt2000
[ANN] eXchaNGeR (XML Browser + Editor) v1.0,
Edwin Dankert
Full-text search in XSLT 2.0/XPath 2.0/XQuery 1.0,
AndrewWatt2000
Safari and XSLT,
Mike Fitzgerald
RE: BOXED XML (was RE: Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Don Box
OASIS TC Call For Participation: Education XML TC,
Karl Best
RXP test release for XML 1.1 and Namespaces 1.1,
Richard Tobin
RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave,
Daniel Veillard
BOXED XML (was RE: Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Don Box
RE: Anyone wanna speculate about what this means?,
Dare Obasanjo
Anyone wanna speculate about what this means?,
Mike Champion
RE: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Dare Obasanjo
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
AndrewWatt2000
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
David Megginson
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Tim Bray
- Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Mike Champion
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering theoriginal XML vision),
Tim Bray
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Daniel Veillard
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering theoriginal XML vision),
Tim Bray
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the originalXML vision),
John Cowan
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Message not available
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Tony Graham
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- Message not available
- Re: Unicode and XML (was Re: Remembering the original XML vision),
Tony Graham
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
David Megginson
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Rick Jelliffe
- Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Jonathan Robie
- RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Owen Walcher
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Wendell Piez
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
David Megginson
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
J.Pietschmann
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
David Megginson
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
J.Pietschmann
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
David Megginson
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Norman Walsh
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
David Megginson
- Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?,
Justin Lipton
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
David Megginson
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Thomas B. Passin
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
David Megginson
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Jonathan Robie
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
AndrewWatt2000
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Dare Obasanjo
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Dare Obasanjo
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Remembering the original XML vision,
Dare Obasanjo
How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
AndrewWatt2000
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jonathan Robie
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jochen Wiedmann
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Water Contract),
Mike Plusch
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XMLvision),
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jochen Wiedmann
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Chiusano Joseph
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jochen Wiedmann
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XMLvision),
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Gustaf Liljegren
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering theoriginal XML vision),
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Jochen Wiedmann
- Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Kohsuke Kawaguchi
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Henry S. Thompson
- Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision),
Rick Jelliffe
RE: XML Schema Regex Pattern Question,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
XML Schema Regex Pattern Question,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
If prefix is exactly 'xml',
nmehrega
Re: New XML tool for improving data-processing performance,
Shigeru Yoshida
Re: Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: Newtool for handling XML in Java),
Bill de hÓra
RE: Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handlingXML in Java),
Jeff Lowery
Picking the Standard (WAS RE: New tool for handling XML in Java),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handling XML in Java),
Dare Obasanjo
RE: web services stack [data + context = information],
James Governor
OASIS TC Call for Participation: WSDM TC (Distributed Mgmt),
Karl Best
OASIS TC Call for Participation: WSRM TC (Reliable Messaging),
Karl Best
New XML tool for improving data-processing performance,
Shigeru Yoshida
finding new directions,
Simon St.Laurent
Xalan 2,4,1 URIResolver problems with JDK 1.4.1,
Andrzej Jan Taramina
RE: New tool for handling XML in Java,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: New tool for handling XML in Java,
Samir Kothari
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: New tool for handling XML in Java,
Sean McGrath
- Must databinding imply tight coupling? (was Re: New tool for handlingXML in Java),
Mike Champion
- Remembering the original XML vision,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Sean McGrath
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
G. Ken Holman
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Wendell Piez
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Jeni Tennison
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Tim Bray
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Sean McGrath
- re: Remembering the original XML vision,
David Megginson
- re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Bill de hÓra
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Mike Champion
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Miles Sabin
- Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision,
Joe English
- Re: New tool for handling XML in Java,
AndrewWatt2000
New tool for handling XML in Java,
Samir Kothari
RE: Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing,
Dare Obasanjo
Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing,
Sean McGrath
RE: more MOPs,
Jeff Lowery
xml for presentations,
Mike Fitzgerald
what is MOPs?,
Owen Walcher
Error parsing &,
Long, Craig Z
utf8 -> utf16 conversion problem ?,
Alex Ben-Ari
RE: Lame patent application of the day,
Doug Ransom
RE: Udell & Dickerson, good reading,
Dare Obasanjo
Udell & Dickerson, good reading,
Tim Bray
RE: patent application (MSFT)--some prior art?,
James Governor
question concerning parsing entity references in xslt,
Bill Riegel
Please help,
thamy logan
RE: patent application (MSFT),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
patent application (MSFT),
Simon St.Laurent
Serializing doc + entities,
Gregory Murphy
Lame patent application of the day,
Dennis Sosnoski
xsi:type and unions,
Alessandro Triglia
Re: Best way to represent fractional values?,
John Cowan
Re: Horse-and-buggy Text Markup Language,
John Cowan
OpenOffice.org Conference (OOoCon 2003) - Call for Papers,
Erwin Tenhumberg
Horse-and-buggy Text Markup Language (Was: SML: Second Try),
AndrewWatt2000
Best way to represent fractional values?,
Hugh Wallis
XForms and "InfoPath",
AndrewWatt2000
RE: Re: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: Microsoft XMLReader,
Dare Obasanjo
Microsoft XMLReader,
=?utf-8?Q?Marcin_Ros=C5=82o=C5=84ski?=
convert my relational database to XML,
madhur jain
RE: headers (was ERH on Web Services,
Don Box
RE: Different kind of Editor,
Bawcom, Aaron
xml/xsl to HTML,
James Rayner
Different kind of Editor,
Bawcom, Aaron
Transformation versus Translation,
Bent Rasmussen
RE: parameter-entity references,
Marko Milicevic
parameter-entity references,
Marko Milicevic
RE: Problem with Inserted space and Character on Solaris,
Jason Brown
RE: KAVI,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: GML->SGML->XML->?->?->?->?->?->?->...,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
KAVI,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
ANN: RELAX NG to Compact Syntax Presentation in HTML (and XSLT Processor Implementer Challenge),
David Rosenborg
Problem with Inserted space and Character on Solaris,
Jason Brown
RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Dave Pawson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Wayne Steele
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Jeff Lowery
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- Re: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Sean McGrath
- RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
RE: XML Vocabulary - Environmental Sampling Data,
James Governor
XML Vocabulary - Environmental Sampling Data,
Chiusano Joseph
Urgent !!,
Kiran Nadgir
RE: XML parser (angry - don't read!),
Jeff Lowery
RE: web services stack,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: web services stack,
Simon St.Laurent
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: web services stack,
Paul Brown
- RE: web services stack,
James Governor
- RE: web services stack,
Don Box
- RE: web services stack,
Dave
- RE: web services stack,
Don Box
- RE: web services stack,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: web services stack,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: web services stack,
Paul Brown
- RE: web services stack,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
web services stack,
Simon St.Laurent
ANNOUNCE: Syntext XslGen - XSLT/XML Aid for Web Site Content Management,
xml-dev
ANNOUNCE: Syntext Dtd2Xs - Complex&Modularized XML DTD to XML SchemaConverter,
xml-dev
RE: SML: Second Try,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Don Park
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Seairth Jacobs
- Re: SML: Second Try,
W. E. Perry
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Jonathan Robie
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Mike Champion
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Mike Champion
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Joe English
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Owen Walcher
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: SML: Second Try,
David Carlisle
- RE: SML: Second Try,
bryan
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Mike Champion
- Re: SML: Second Try,
John Cowan
- Re: SML: Second Try,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try),
Seairth Jacobs
- Re: SML: Second Try,
J.Pietschmann
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Jeff Lowery
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: SML: Second Try,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Fwd: web service article,
Camille Jacks
SML: Second Try,
Don Park
WAP/WML/WBXML,
Chiusano Joseph
Faster Web Services,
Chiusano Joseph
XPath position in XSLT,
Schaik, L.B. van
RE: misunderstanding of XML Schema ?,
Bill Riegel
RE: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
misunderstanding of XML Schema ?,
Bill Riegel
RE: Resources Redeemed,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Tahir Hashmi
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Chiusano Joseph
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
James Fuller
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Rich Salz
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Jonathan Robie
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Tahir Hashmi
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Dennis Sosnoski
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Alaric Snell
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Alaric B. Snell
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Robin Berjon
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Tahir Hashmi
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Mike Champion
- Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative,
Joe English
XML parser bencmark to compare .NET parser and Java parser?,
Jenny Wong
Resources Redeemed,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
SVG OPEN 2003 CALL FOR PARTICIPATION,
Philip Mansfield
ANN: Examplotron 0.7,
Eric van der Vlist
Re: XML Editors supporting change tracking (redliningetc.),
Robin LaFontaine
RE: SAX Parser and Attribute Normalization,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
UDDI Spec TC committee spec public review,
Karl Best
Re: poisoned markup,
Benderjgxd
RE: Usefulness of well-formedness was RE: SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services),
Dare Obasanjo
RE: SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services),
Dare Obasanjo
Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Daniel Veillard
- SML (was Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Joe English
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Rich Salz
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Rich Salz
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Rich Salz
- poisoned markup,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: poisoned markup,
Rich Salz
- Re: poisoned markup,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: poisoned markup,
Rich Salz
- Re: poisoned markup,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Mike Champion
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Mike Champion
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Mike Champion
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Mike Champion
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Miles Sabin
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Uche Ogbuji
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Mike Champion
- headers (was ERH on Web Services,
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
=?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Elliotte Rusty Harold
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Uche Ogbuji
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Dare Obasanjo
- RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Dare Obasanjo
- Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Chiusano Joseph
- RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Bullard, Claude L (Len)
- RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services,
Don Box
|
Cart