XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - February, 2003

• XML Catalog support for .Net (and others), Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • Re: XML Catalog support for .Net (and others), Chiusano Joseph
  • Re: XML Catalog support for .Net (and others), Chiusano Joseph
• RE: XML - Disruptive Technology, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML - Disruptive Technology, Doug Ransom
  • RE: XML - Disruptive Technology, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• XML - Disruptive Technology, Doug Ransom
• Namespaces conformance tests, Karl Waclawek
  • Re: Namespaces conformance tests, Chiusano Joseph
    • Re: Namespaces conformance tests, Karl Waclawek
  • Re: Namespaces conformance tests, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Namespaces conformance tests, Karl Waclawek
• Having to programmically create XML Schema, is there a better way that just using the Document Object Model, Bill Riegel
• getting undisered results , when trying to display japanese characters, asim
• Markup: The Early Years, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Unicode With Angle Brackets, Dare Obasanjo
• XML Parsers, Michael Hoffman
• trying to convert Java Date to/from the XML Schema dataTime datatype., Bill Riegel
  • Re: trying to convert Java Date to/from the XML Schema dataTime datatype., Jeff Greif
• The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP], Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • Re: The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML,and SOAP], Robin Berjon
    • Re: The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data,XML, and SOAP], Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP], Robin Berjon
      • Re: The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data,XML, and SOAP], Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML, and SOAP], Robin Berjon
  • Re: The supersetting has begun [Was Re: Opaque data, XML,and SOAP], Rich Salz
• Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?, Matthew.Bennett
  • RE: Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?, Martin Soukup
  • Re: Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?, akmal @ city
  • Re: Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?, Gregory Murphy
    • Re: Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?, John Cowan
      • Re: Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?, Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • Re: Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?, Joe English
  • Re: Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?, Jonathan Robie
• Problematical scenarios, Matthew.Bennett
• Joint whitepaper on XML, SOAP, and Binary Data, Mike Champion
• RE: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????), Dare Obasanjo
  • Which XML API?, Joseph
• RE: XML for the Restaurant Industry, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• XML for the Restaurant Industry, Samuel Dorfman
  • Re: XML for the Restaurant Industry, Chiusano Joseph
  • Re: XML for the Restaurant Industry, Karl Waclawek
• New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition, Henry S. Thompson
  • Re: New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition, Jeff Rafter
    • Re: New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition, Henry S. Thompson
  • Message not available
    • Re: New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition, Henry S. Thompson
• RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Jeff Lowery
    • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Daniel Veillard
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Dare Obasanjo
    • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Dennis Sosnoski
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Jeff Lowery
    • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
    • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, John Cowan
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Jeff Lowery
    • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, W. E. Perry
      • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, John Cowan
    • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Joe English
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Jeff Lowery
    • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, John Cowan
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Jeff Lowery
    • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Chiusano Joseph
      • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Chiusano Joseph
      • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Chiusano Joseph
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Jeff Lowery
    • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Alaric B. Snell
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Jeff Lowery
    • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Martin Klang
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Chiusano Joseph
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Daniel Veillard
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Martin Klang
  • RE: Registered Namespace prefixes, Jeff Lowery
• Registered Namespace prefixes, Jeff Lowery
  • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Daniel Veillard
    • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, John Cowan
      • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Alaric Snell
      • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, John Cowan
      • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Bill de hÓra
    • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Chiusano Joseph
      • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Daniel Veillard
  • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
  • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, james anderson
  • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, W. E. Perry
  • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, K. Ari Krupnikov
  • Re: Registered Namespace prefixes, Chiusano Joseph
• RE: collisions (was The subsetting has begun), Dare Obasanjo
  • Re: collisions (was The subsetting has begun), Daniel Veillard
  • Re: collisions (was The subsetting has begun), Joe English
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: collisions (was The subsetting has begun), Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: collisions (was The subsetting has begun), Simon St.Laurent
• RE: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Xpath & conditional filters, David Higgins
• RE: On permathreads, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: On permathreads, bryan
    • Re: On permathreads, Alaric B. Snell
      • RE: On permathreads, bryan
      • Re: On permathreads, Alaric B. Snell
• RE: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: [xm l-dev] The subsetting has begun), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: The subsetting has begun), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: The subsetting has begun), Rich Salz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Pure syntax vs the Infoset permathread (was Re: The subsetting has begun), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• special characters, monica.coelho
  • Re: special characters, Chiusano Joseph
  • Re: special characters, Rick Jelliffe
• Call for information about XML-Fragments, MASSIMILIANO GRANDI
  • Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments, Daniel Veillard
    • Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments, Robin Berjon
      • Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments, Daniel Veillard
• [ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-02-25, Tech Support
• Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Matthew.Bennett
  • re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, David Megginson
    • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Robin Berjon
    • Message not available
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, David Megginson
    • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, J.Pietschmann
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, David Megginson
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Mike Champion
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, David Megginson
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Robin Berjon
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, David Megginson
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Alaric B. Snell
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, David Megginson
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Alaric B. Snell
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, David Megginson
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Robin Berjon
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Tim Bray
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Robin Berjon
      • Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????), Mike Champion
      • Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????), =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
      • Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????), Alaric B. Snell
      • Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????), Robin Berjon
      • Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????), Alaric B. Snell
      • Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????), =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
      • Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????), Miles Sabin
      • Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????), Robin Berjon
      • Re: Use cases for parsing efficiency (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????), Matt
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Alaric B. Snell
    • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, W. E. Perry
      • Some notes on the binxml permathread (was: Re: Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????), Robin Berjon
      • On permathreads, bryan
      • Re: On permathreads, Alaric B. Snell
    • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Karl Waclawek
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Robin Berjon
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Karl Waclawek
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Alaric B. Snell
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Karl Waclawek
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Robin Berjon
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Karl Waclawek
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Robin Berjon
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Karl Waclawek
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Robin Berjon
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Karl Waclawek
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, W. E. Perry
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Tahir Hashmi
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Alaric Snell
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Alaric B. Snell
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Alaric B. Snell
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Dennis Sosnoski
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Robin Berjon
      • Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re: Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????), Mike Champion
      • Unicode With Angle Brackets, Jonathan Robie
      • Re: Unicode With Angle Brackets, W. E. Perry
      • Re: Unicode With Angle Brackets, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re: Parsingefficiency? - why not 'compile'????), W. E. Perry
      • Re: Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????), Robin Berjon
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Tahir Hashmi
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Robin Berjon
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Robin Berjon
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Tahir Hashmi
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Robin Berjon
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, John Cowan
      • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Robin Berjon
  • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????, Elliotte Rusty Harold
• RE: DOM support in IE vs. NS, Joshua Allen
  • Re: DOM support in IE vs. NS, Thomas B. Passin
  • Re: DOM support in IE vs. NS, Ken Sall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: DOM support in IE vs. NS, Joshua Allen
• Does IE 6.0 support XML Schema validation when displaying selected XML files, Bill Riegel
  • RE: Does IE 6.0 support XML Schema validation when displaying selected XML files, Julian Reschke
• RE: Parsing Performance, Bill Riegel
  • Re: Parsing Performance, Dennis Sosnoski
• DOM support in IE vs. NS, Ken Sall
  • RE: DOM support in IE vs. NS, Julian Reschke
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DOM support in IE vs. NS, Heikki Toivonen
• No Standard Before Its Time (WAS RE: Parsing Performance), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsetting has begun), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Could someone give a precise definition to these terms and the relationships between them?, Collin
  • Re: Could someone give a precise definition to these terms and the relationships between them?, Chiusano Joseph
  • RE: Could someone give a precise definition to these terms and the relationships between them?, Michael Kay
• XML for RFCs, Alaric B. Snell
  • Re: XML for RFCs, Rich Salz
  • RE: XML for RFCs, bryan
    • Re: XML for RFCs, Alaric B. Snell
      • RE: XML for RFCs, bryan
  • Re: XML for RFCs, Miloslav Nic
    • Re: XML for RFCs, Alaric B. Snell
    • RE: XML for RFCs, bryan
      • RE: XML for RFCs, Miloslav Nic
• Re: Transformation Error , PLZ HELP, asim
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Transformation Error , PLZ HELP, Joe Fawcett
    • Re: Transformation Error , PLZ HELP, asim
• Transformation Error , PLZ HELP, asim
• SAX Adapter Framework - New Open Source Project, Mark Priest
• Re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Daniel Veillard
    • Re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Mike Champion
      • Re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Mike Champion
      • Re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Mike Kozlowski
• xml/xsl won't display when used online, James Rayner
• The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Tim Bray
  • Re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Don Bate
    • Re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Tim Bray
  • RE: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Don Park
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Sean McGrath
    • Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Tim Bray
      • Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Mike Champion
      • Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
      • Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Miles Sabin
      • Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
      • [ANN] Montreal information for Extreme 2003, Sam Hunting
      • Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, John Cowan
      • Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Mike Champion
      • Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Mark Baker
      • Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Lauren Wood
      • Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Sean McGrath
      • Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch, Elliotte Rusty Harold
• RE: XQuery and SQL Server Yukon, Dare Obasanjo
  • Re: XQuery and SQL Server Yukon, Charles White
• XQuery and SQL Server Yukon, Charles White
• nillable keyrefs in XSD, K. Ari Krupnikov
• RE: RE: Open Source or Else, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: The subsetting has begun, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The subsetting has begun, Evan Lenz
    • Re: The subsetting has begun, Mike Champion
      • Message not available
      • Fwd: Re: The subsetting has begun, Mike Champion
  • Re: The subsetting has begun, Jon.Ellis
    • Re: The subsetting has begun, Amelia A.Lewis
    • Re: The subsetting has begun, John Cowan
    • RE: The subsetting has begun, Evan Lenz
      • Re: The subsetting has begun, John Cowan
      • Re: The subsetting has begun, Thomas B. Passin
    • Re: The subsetting has begun, Daniel Veillard
      • The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsetting has begun), Mike Champion
      • Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: Thesubsetting has begun), Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsettinghas begun), =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
      • Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: Thesubsetting has begun), Mike Champion
      • Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsetting has begun), Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: Thesubsetting has begun), Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsetting has begun), Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: The waterfall model lives? (was Re: The subsetting has begun), Daniel Veillard
      • Re: The waterfall model lives?, Norman Walsh
      • Re: The waterfall model lives?, Mike Champion
    • Re: The subsetting has begun, Fredrik Lindgren
    • Re: The subsetting has begun, Bill de hÓra
    • Re: The subsetting has begun, Dennis Sosnoski
      • Re: The subsetting has begun, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: The subsetting has begun, Karl Waclawek
      • Entity declarations and non-validating parsers, Elliotte Rusty Harold
      • Re: Entity declarations and non-validating parsers, Karl Waclawek
      • Re: Entity declarations and non-validating parsers, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: Entity declarations and non-validating parsers, David Megginson
      • Re: Entity declarations and non-validating parsers, Karl Waclawek
      • Re: The subsetting has begun, Dennis Sosnoski
  • Re: The subsetting has begun, Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • RE: The subsetting has begun, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: The subsetting has begun, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: The subsetting has begun, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: The subsetting has begun, Gavin Thomas Nicol
    • Re: The subsetting has begun, Joe English
  • RE: The subsetting has begun, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: The subsetting has begun, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • FW: The subsetting has begun, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: The subsetting has begun, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: The subsetting has begun, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: The subsetting has begun, Gavin Thomas Nicol
  • RE: The subsetting has begun, Bullard, Claude L (Len)