[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?


publisher 2003 trouble with styles
On Tuesday 18 February 2003 12:01 pm, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> >The main thing is that if people use fonts (and hopefully styles)
> >consistently, you can work with the data. There are reasonable, and
> > improving conversion tools that can work with that as a basis.
>
> When I write a document from scratch, I do.
. . .
> For me, it's easier to just write it using text in the first place, 
> but we're all angle-bracket geeks here. Most authors don't think 
> like we do.

Quite right. I learned that lesson the hard way ;-)

> FWIW, after insisting that I use Microsoft Word, a publisher is also
> telling me I have to make sure, by hand, that I am following all the
> guidelines that an XML editor would have enforced for me....

That happens. It's worse in some cases because they also have poor styles 
(everything is 10 or 12pt courier) so visual people (me included) get totally 
lost. In a situation like that, I would(did), of course, write a few macros 
to convert from *my* styles to *their* styles, so I could write comfortably.

Here's two observations though:

1) Most publishers have to deal with far more variety than you might 
expect.... many people I've seen have trouble using styles *at all*, and find 
even font consistency hard. For many people, they necessarily escape the 
bounds placed upon them, because they cannot work any other way.

2) Relatively few people have the skill level that xml-dev folk have... so 
they can't even write macros, or conversion tools to make their life easier. 
They almost certainly can't appreciate the value in conformance enough that 
they might even desire to do so.

Both (1) and (2) lead me to believe that even if really cool XML authoring 
tools existed, it would still be very hard to count on the data being 
correct. You will *have* to, at some point, do further manipulation.

Another data point: tagging accuracy for data-entry folk (double keying) is 
typically around 90%, and these people are *paid* to care. Even in the world 
of relational databases, I read that the overall data accuracy in most 
corporate databases is something like 95-98%.







PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.