[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the o

• To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Subject: Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 00:36:58 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: AndrewWatt2000@a..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.0.20030215153127.01122d98@n...>from Jonathan Robie at "Feb 15, 2003 04:24:13 pm"

Jonathan Robie scripsit:

> Two (DTDs and W3C XML Schema) is already awkward. Three would be more 
> awkward, but I think it *would* make sense for the W3C to specify a third 
> schema language: a simple, well designed language that used the same types 
> as W3C XML Schema.

ISO/IEC 19757:2 by any other name would smell as sweet.

> But I would only support it if it had a prayer of being implemented and 
> used. 

It has been.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@c...
To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all.  There
are no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language
that they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful.
        --_The Hobbit_

• References:
  • Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• Previous by thread: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
• Next by thread: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread