[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments

• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>
• Subject: Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments
• From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:02:02 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <02b201c2dcfe$689e1670$4bc8a8c0@A...>; from ricko@a... on Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:47:55AM +1100
• References: <508HBykzY0304S01.1046170310@u...> <20030225060810.E16255@r...> <3E5B8310.4030603@e...> <20030225095441.K16255@r...> <02b201c2dcfe$689e1670$4bc8a8c0@A...>
• Reply-to: veillard@r...
• User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:47:55AM +1100, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> From: "Daniel Veillard" <veillard@r...>
> 
> >   Well, that spec, was simple, in time, but nobody implemented it at the
> > time. Maybe there is renewed interest now, but that's why things stopped
> > suddenly then.
> 
> Actually, I made an implementation of an XML-Fragment server based
> on DOM and a student (now working here) made a streaming
> implementatation with an XPath subset.

  Yep, I remember that, but we had 0 client code.

> The only vagely tricky parts were
> 
> 1) making some kind of calling conventions which includes namespaces
> (which XPointer now can free us from)
> 
> 2) the need to specify how to bubble down/up namespace declarations 

  I think entities were also a problem.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@r...  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

• References:
  • Call for information about XML-Fragments
    • From: MASSIMILIANO GRANDI <massimiliano.grandi@u...>
  • Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
  • Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
  • Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• Next by Date: RE: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• Previous by thread: Re: Call for information about XML-Fragments
• Next by thread: special characters
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread