[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch

• To: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Subject: Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch
• From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
• Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:16:03 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <E18nIwx-0000PX-00@m...>; from cowan@m... on Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 08:47:19AM -0500
• References: <oprk18a51jezizxn@s...> <E18nIwx-0000PX-00@m...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 08:47:19AM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> The Sun specification makes it impossible to use a conformant XML parser as
> a J2ME implementation.

Which is ironic considering that my team built a conformant J2ME/CLDC
non-validating SAX based XML parser for Sun back in '99.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis

• References:
  • Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: No Standard Before Its Time (WAS RE: Parsing Performance)
• Next by Date: RE: Could someone give a precise definition to these terms and the relationships between them?
• Previous by thread: Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch
• Next by thread: Re: re: The J2ME pseudo-XML botch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread