Re: SML: Second Try
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > 3rd Option: Do nothing. Leave XML as it is. It works. It's proven. It's > not perfect, but it's damn good, and hits a really nice middle point > between the needs of many different communities. Don't trim it. Don't > create alternate syntaxes. Just use it. The current set of XML standards is good, but it could still use a bit more modularity and consistency. Whether you call it XML 2.0 or FubarML doesn't really matter, however, something will evolve where "canonical" *is* actually canonical, and where the transformation processor spec isn't authoritative for serialization, where validating isn't an integral part of parsing and where "default values" won't get in the way of in-memory representations. J.Pietschmann
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format