[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision

• To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Subject: Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 10:10:35 -0800
• Cc: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.0.20030215103907.046f26b0@n...>
• References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030215082258.03f498d8@n...-techno logies.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20030213121839.03083488@m...> <5.2.0.9.0.20030215103907.046f26b0@n...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130

Jonathan Robie wrote:
> With respect, ASN.1 and Corba are precisely the kind of thing that many 
> dataheads were running away from when they turned to XML. Regardless, I 
> don't think anyone is going to be able to stop people from using XML for 
> data, or from wanting datatypes for their XML.

I've been thinking about this quite a bit recently.  ASN.1 has always 
been type-aware; in fact I've heard it alleged that it's little more 
than a really fully thought out type system.

So at the end of the day, by default, when you get an ASN.1 message you 
get a set of un-named but strongly typed data items.  When you get an 
XML message, by default you get a set of named but untyped data 
messages.  History would seem to show which of these is more useful. -Tim

• References:
  • Re: New tool for handling XML in Java
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>
  • Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the original XML vision)
• Next by Date: RE: Remembering the original XML vision
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread