[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: SML: Second Try

• To: "'Xml-Dev'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: SML: Second Try
• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:47:15 -0800
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <4827EC373E03DB44AC2AB3900430896B0265AB@w...>
• Organization: Docuverse

Guys,

I don't know why, but I almost never do same thing twice.  I have worked on
Minimal-XML and Common-XML from the *minimal* and *common* perspectives of
the word *simple*.  Now I am looking at the word from the *user-friendly*
and "easy-viewing" perspective.  I am not looking to weed arcane features
out of XML.

What I WANT as a result of current effort is a simple and not necessarily
complete syntax that text editors and development tools will commonly
support as an alternate view of XML documents.  This means XSLT and plug-ins
for browsers and editors.

What I DON'T WANT to see is this syntax being used to exchange or store
data.

Best,

Don Park
Docuverse

• References:
  • RE: SML: Second Try
    • From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: SML: Second Try
• Next by Date: RE: SML: Second Try
• Previous by thread: RE: SML: Second Try
• Next by thread: RE: SML: Second Try
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread