|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: How to redesign W3C XML Schema (Was: Remembering the o
I see good things in WXS, but it has been hard to find good arguments to use it. WXS would have a right of existence to me if it was a good schema language for serialized objects. But as others have pointed out many times, it's unnecessarily verbose and it has too many examples of "there's more than one way to do it", making it too hard to implement. If the WG gives WXS a remake, I think they shall concentrate on the task of making it easy for computers to read and write. DTD and RNG are already good enough alternatives for us humans. In short, the WG must recognize that there are other schema languages in use out here and try to find that *niche* for WXS that appeals especially to dataheads, which was the reason to make WXS in the first place. Gustaf
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








