[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interl

• To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@c...>
• Subject: Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
• From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
• Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 05:04:44 -0500
• Cc: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <f5b1y25vrne.fsf@e...>; from ht@c... on Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:56:21AM +0000
• References: <20030217080054.X29764@r...> <498736294.1045533363@[192.168.0.10]> <20030217142838.C3794@r...> <3E51559B.618EFBE9@k...> <f5b1y25vrne.fsf@e...>
• Reply-to: veillard@r...
• User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:56:21AM +0000, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...> writes:
> 
> > Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > 
> > >   While I have your focus, I feel a bit annoyed by letting the validator
> > > accept values broken by PIs or comments in the serialization pass through
> > > the WXS datatype checker.
> > >   Do people really expect
> > >      "12<!-- comment -->e-12"
> > > to validate as an xs:float in practice ?
> > 
> > It looks weird but I think that this should validate.
> 
> W3C XML Schema REC is clear that this _is_ OK -- non-character
> infoitems are ignored in constructing [schema normalized value] of
> element infoitems, which is the starting point for datatypes
> processing.

  Okidoc, if everybody agrees it's okay, I'm not the one who will
protest, it actually make my life easier :-)

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@r...  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

• References:
  • RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
  • Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions oninterleave
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
  • Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>
  • Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
• Next by Date: Re: Strong versus (weak|runtime) typing
• Previous by thread: Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
• Next by thread: RXP test release for XML 1.1 and Namespaces 1.1
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread