[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interl

• To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>
• Subject: Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Date: 18 Feb 2003 09:56:21 +0000
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3E51559B.618EFBE9@k...>
• References: <20030217080054.X29764@r...><498736294.1045533363@[192.168.0.10]><20030217142838.C3794@r...> <3E51559B.618EFBE9@k...>
• Sender: ht@i...
• User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code)

Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...> writes:

> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> 
> >   While I have your focus, I feel a bit annoyed by letting the validator
> > accept values broken by PIs or comments in the serialization pass through
> > the WXS datatype checker.
> >   Do people really expect
> >      "12<!-- comment -->e-12"
> > to validate as an xs:float in practice ?
> 
> It looks weird but I think that this should validate.

W3C XML Schema REC is clear that this _is_ OK -- non-character
infoitems are ignored in constructing [schema normalized value] of
element infoitems, which is the starting point for datatypes
processing.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                      Half-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>

• References:
  • RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
  • Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions oninterleave
    • From: James Clark <jjc@j...>
  • Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
  • Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Remembering the original XML vision
• Next by Date: Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
• Previous by thread: Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
• Next by thread: Re: RelaxNG problem about section 7.4. Restrictions on interleave
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread