Re: Xqueeze: Compact XML Alternative
Rich Salz wrote: > How much of the problem "XML needs to be compressed" is solved by just > using GZIP transfer encoding over HTTP? As Alaric said, it solves the size problem, but that's just about it. Depending on the platform it may worsen the speed problem. Here are your typical requirements for a binary infosets format (they are met by very few of the available options): - size - speed (parsing time) - streaming (the ability to send the document in independent, yet well-formed as per the binary format, fragments. Those are possibly sent in an order that does not match that of the document. This ties in strongly with XML Fragments and XML Packaging) - random access (being able to skip straight to the portion of the document you want, without having to parse it all) In addition to that you might want things like backward/forward compatibility accross schema changes. -- Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> Research Engineer, Expway http://expway.fr/ 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format