[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????

• To: robin.berjon@e...
• Subject: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 08:08:23 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3E5DE241.3050703@e...>
• References: <OF047F14BF.0A3C2919-ONCA256CD8.00031C17@f...><E18nbOK-0004gi-00@c...><007301c2dcdc$1933dba0$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k><3E5B84CF.4020703@e...><20030226152200.4c0b681b.code_martial@s...><3E5DE241.3050703@e...>

At 11:02 AM +0100 2/27/03, Robin Berjon wrote:


>I'm all for finding a sweet spot but pulling random numbers out of a 
>hat and making broad assumptions about size vs computation won't 
>contribute much in getting there. I am talking about empirically 
>proven, tested, retested, put to work in a wide variety of 
>situations, factors of 10, 20 or 50 (or more, but testing on SOAP is 
>cheating ;).

Is there any actual publication with verifiable, reproducible data? I 
don't need fancy peer-reviewed journals or anything, just a web page 
that outlines the test methodology and provides the code used and the 
test cases.

So far, it all sounds like numbers out of a hat to me.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|           Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava             |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA  |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• References:
  • Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
    • From: Matthew.Bennett@f...
  • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
    • From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@a...>
  • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
  • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
  • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
    • From: Tahir Hashmi <code_martial@s...>
  • Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• Next by Date: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• Previous by thread: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• Next by thread: Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread