[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Fwd: Re: The subsetting has begun

• To: XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Fwd: Re: The subsetting has begun
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:13:44 -0500
• In-reply-to: <20030221165117.E14872@w...>
• References: <20030221195125.7E2414F896@d...><20030221205359.95089.qmail@w...><20030221165117.E14872@w...>
• User-agent: Opera7.0/Win32 M2 build 2637

[forwarded on behalf of Liam Quinn]

> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 12:53:59PM -0800, Mike Champion wrote:
>> It would be real nice to hear from someone on the
>> Expert Group on this matter, hint, hint, if you're
>> lurking out there.

 I'm probably not the only person unable to post to xml-dev.
 Feel free to forward this there if you think it will help :-)

 The W3C Tag has considered the issue of subsets of XML, and made a
 suggestion tht the W3C XML Core WG consider them in more detail.

 For my part I don't like making DOCTYPE an error, as it reduces
 interoperability.  It' slike going back to the SGML days where some
 tools required DOCTYPE in a DTD (although the spec outlowed it) and
 others (correctly) forbade it, so you had to go through hoops to get
 both Arbortext Adept Editor and SoftQuad Author/Editor to share files.

 But maybe it will turn out that there are sufficient reasons.
 Best,

 Liam




-- 
Mike Champion

• References:
  • Re: The subsetting has begun
    • From: "Evan Lenz" <evan@e...>
  • Re: The subsetting has begun
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XQuery and SQL Server Yukon
• Next by Date: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Previous by thread: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Next by thread: Re: The subsetting has begun
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread