Re: SML: Second Try
On Thu, 06 Feb 2003 11:49:38 -0500, Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...> wrote: > > There is no one API for XML, and there are real advantages to several > common APIs. I don't think we're done with innovation here. I agree ... why don't you agree that there is no one syntax for XML, and there are real advantages to several alternatives, and we're not done with innovation here either? I should probably put a smiley because some people feel so strongly that the XML syntax is the rock on which all this is founded, and we really don't need to go around that track once again. Still, let's just say that I consider it to be an open question as to which bits of "XML" are truly sine qua non. We can all probably agree that there is no One True API ... or Schema language (even the W3C blesses both DTD and XSDL), or query language (XPath, XQuery, XSLT ...). We pretty much have to agree that XML got where it is today by innovatively considering the advantages of subsetting SGML syntax. I'm just not clear where the idea comes from that XML 1.x itself should be immune to the forces that created it and the forces that are driving the specs surrounding it. This reminds me a bit of von Clausewitz' maxim, "A conqueror is always a lover of peace." :-)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format