Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
David Megginson wrote: > On the other hand, text compresses very well during network transfer, > and XML, particularly so. That's why we need to run some real-world > tests rather than speculating -- far too many of the mob of existing > XML-related specs have been produced on speculation and wishful > thinking rather than based on experience and proven need. > > I have no objection to coming up with better ways of moving > information around, with or without XML, but first I need (a) > credible, repeatable field tests that prove that there's a significant > problem, and then (b) credible, repeatable field tests that prove that > a different format can actually solve those problems. With those > results in hand, then we can talk about the costs and benefits (and > whether the XML activity is the right place to try to solve the > problem). I am scheduled to speak on the topic of binary infosets at XML Europe in May. I have all sorts of field tests and lab tests from a variety of situation that I believe are credible and repeatable. I can fairly easily pick a few representative cases and expose them there (and put up slides/notes on it for those that won't be attending). For that matter I'd love to know which particular type of case studies people would be interested in seeing (in the talk, but also in much more detail online if need be). I do not intend to have people that don't need binfosets to use them, I'd just like to convince them to stop throwing stones my way :) -- Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> Research Engineer, Expway http://expway.fr/ 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format