[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Udell & Dickerson, good reading

• To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Subject: Re: Udell & Dickerson, good reading
• From: Bill Humphries <bill@w...>
• Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:49:17 -0800
• Cc: "Tim Bray" <tbray@t...>, "XML Dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B54C88@R...>

On Tuesday, February 11, 2003, at 10:55 AM, Dare Obasanjo wrote:

> XML is not a panacea. Film at 11.

http://www.yarinareth.net/caveatlector/archive/ 
week_2002_12_15.html#e001172

Cue the video loop of Steve B with a new phrase dubbed in: "Editors,  
editors, editors, editors, editors!"

You have to have an editor in the process, otherwise your writers find  
clever ways around your schema and drift sets in. It isn't much work if  
it's done regularly.

This should probably go over to the hypertext list if it warrants  
further discussion.

----
Bill Humphries <bill@w...>
http://www.whump.com/moreLikeThis/

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Udell & Dickerson, good reading
    • From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>

• References:
  • RE: Udell & Dickerson, good reading
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Lame patent application of the day
• Next by Date: Re: question concerning parsing entity references in xslt
• Previous by thread: RE: Udell & Dickerson, good reading
• Next by thread: RE: Udell & Dickerson, good reading
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread