Re: Unicode With Angle Brackets
Jonathan Robie wrote: > Does anybody really believe that XML is just UnicodeWithAngleBrackets, or is > that hyperbole? An XML *instance* is, in fact, just UnicodeWithAngleBrackets. It is only in parsing an instance, and in instantiating some data structure on the output of the parse, that elements, attributes, etc. are apprehended and reified in some sensible way for the use at hand. > Here's a view that I might call the "Only Structure" view: XML, like any > language, has a surface syntax and associated semantics. "Unicode With Angle > Brackets" describes the surface syntax, and the BNF in the XML Recommendation > tells how to parse this syntax and what structures it expresses. The labelled > structures expressed by an XML document are the > semantics of the document. As an XML *instance* is just UnicodeWithAngleBrackets, the instance manifests only surface syntax. Semantics, in this case as in all others, are elaborated from text by the operation of process. They do not inhere in the instance, nor could you point out their locus there. The BNF productions of the Rec calibrate a proper XML parser in its job of determining conformance of an instance to the Rec. If that parsing is not terminated by draconian error handling, some labelled structures (not *the* labelled structures, if by that you imply some single canonical set) elaborated from that processing of that text instance are instantiated on the output of the parse, and those structures may indeed be said to embody one possible set of semantic outcomes from the processing of that document. Respectfully, Walter Perry
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format