[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services

• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Subject: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
• Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:01:05 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1023-AA95F8803D1511D7BB6D0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>; from simonstl@s... on Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:35:29AM -0500
• References: <3E47D07C.7080902@d...> <r01050400-1023-AA95F8803D1511D7BB6D0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:35:29AM -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> rsalz@d... (Rich Salz) writes:
> >Oh this is so wrong.  Cf RFC 3117.
> 
> RFC 3117 ("On the Design of Application Protocols") is excellent reading
> whatever your protocol interests or arguments may be.  It's really nice
> to have an informational RFC explaining the why that accompanies the
> more formal RFCs (3080, 3081) explaining how.
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3117.txt

There's some good stuff in there, but also a lot of incorrect stuff
as well, especially the conclusion.

We need less protocols, not more, because we need more interoperability,
not less.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
    • From: "Alaric B. Snell" <alaric@a...>
  • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>
  • Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• Next by Date: Re: Microsoft XMLReader
• Previous by thread: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• Next by thread: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread