[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?

  • To: 'Gavin Thomas Nicol' <gtn@r...>, xml-dev@l...
  • Subject: RE: Re: Are the publishing users happy? Why not?
  • From: Doug Rudder <drudder@d...>
  • Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:31:00 -0600

doug rudder xml 2001
>Here's the point: people need to be educated as well as coerced through 
>software, and even then, there *will* be exceptions.

Education is certainly a key component.  I work for a publisher that uses a
markup-based publishing system (reference publishing).  I joined the company
in 1993 as a technical writer/editor about a month after they began
implementing the new publishing system. Adjusting to a structured
authoring/editing environment required a huge shift in mindset for all of
us, and there was certainly resistance to the change.  But what was once a
print-only publishing house now has a variety of electronic products and
data licensing initiatives enabled by SGML/XML that would not have been
possible before.

I'm now the XML/SGML analyst, DTD developer, and OmniMark programmer at the
company (proof that *anyone* can be taught :-) ).  Part of my function has
been that of markup evangelist; both in concepts and training. It led to the
presentation I did at XML 2001 and AUGI 2002 on Technical Writing and XML.

There is indeed interest from the tech writers and editors in understanding
the whole structured authoring world.  After the presentation at AUGI 2002
(ArborText User Group), a number of attendees asked why there were not more
sessions aimed at authors/editors; most sessions are technical. There was
enough interest that I am currently working on another presentation, kind of
a brief writer's guide to XML.

I would be greatly interesting in receiving input/comments/opinions from
other experiences with introducing writers/editors to a structured markup
environment. All of my experience (9+ years) is with the same company,
working in a number of closely related problem spaces; other perspectives
would be useful to me.

If anyone is interested (entirely up to you), my original XML 2001
presentation is available on the precedings CD or online at:
http://www.idealliance.org/xmlfiles/issue37/techwriting.asp. It provides
perspective related to XML in reference publishing and discussion related to
the issues in this thread. Any feedback would be welcome.

____________________________________
Douglas Rudder     drudder@d...
"At least in theory, XML is supposed to provide a middle ground 
between human and machine-readable." -- Simon St. Laurent

"Schema designers, authors, and those developing the software 
that processes the data all have to work together to find
the appropriate tradeoffs." -- Mike Champion

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.