Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????
mc@x... (Mike Champion) writes: >The question in my mind is do we want these use cases under a big tent >called "XML" or do we want to encourage them to fork off. I realize >that the "just fork off and take your pollution with you" faction is >well represented on this list, but remember what happened when XML >forked off SGML .... the fork-ee took all the mindshare with it. It's a much bigger tent this time, more minds to share. Beats eating, uh, pollution. -- "Put a fork in him - he's done." - classic snide remark. Simon St.Laurent http://simonstl.com http://monasticxml.com
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format