XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - May, 2003

• Fwd: xml element naming, chasee
• xml element naming, chasee
  • Re: xml element naming, Chiusano Joseph
• latest on IE, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: latest on IE, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)
• Re: human interaction with XML, AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: human interaction with XML, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: human interaction with XML, Didier PH Martin
  • Re: human interaction with XML, Mitch Amiano
• human interaction with XML, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: human interaction with XML, Chiusano Joseph
    • Re: human interaction with XML, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: human interaction with XML, W. E. Perry
  • Re: human interaction with XML, Rex Brooks
    • Re: human interaction with XML, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: human interaction with XML, Rex Brooks
  • Re: human interaction with XML, Tim Bray
    • Re: human interaction with XML, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: human interaction with XML, Mitch Amiano
• Standards and Namespaces - tangling two threads, Mike Champion
  • Re: Standards and Namespaces - tangling two threads, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Bill_de_h=D3ra?=
  • Re: Standards and Namespaces - tangling two threads, K. Ari Krupnikov
• RE: Tools creating problems, Jeff Lowery
  • RE: Tools creating problems, Simon St.Laurent
• How to define separate schema definition for the same element type..., John Stubbe
• Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Sean McGrath
  • Tools creating problems, Simon St.Laurent
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Hunsberger, Peter
• RE: Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination), Hunsberger, Peter
  • Re: Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination), Seairth Jacobs
    • Re: Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination), Tim Bray
      • Re: Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination), Seairth Jacobs
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination), Hunsberger, Peter
• RE: Vocabulary Combination, Jeff Lowery
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Vocabulary Combination, Hunsberger, Peter
    • Choosing when to namespace (was Re: Vocabulary Combination), Seairth Jacobs
• data definition, Michael Wilson
  • Re: data definition, Chiusano Joseph
  • Re: data definition, John Cowan
• Vocabulary Combination, Arjun Ray
  • Re: Vocabulary Combination, John Cowan
    • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Arjun Ray
    • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Arjun Ray
  • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Tim Bray
    • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Arjun Ray
    • Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Joe Gregorio
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Seairth Jacobs
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Joe Gregorio
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, james anderson
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Rich Salz
      • Customizing error messages, Jaywanth
      • Re: Customizing error messages, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, W. E. Perry
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, james anderson
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, james anderson
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, james anderson
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Paul Prescod
      • Pay no attention to the URI behind the curtain, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Joe Gregorio
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Joe English
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, james anderson
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, james anderson
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, james anderson
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, james anderson
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, W. E. Perry
      • Data vs. Process was Re: Vocabulary Combination ..., Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Data vs. Process was Re: Vocabulary Combination..., Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Data vs. Process was Re: Vocabulary Combination ..., Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Data vs. Process was Re: Vocabulary Combination ..., Miles Sabin
      • Re: Data vs. Process was Re: Vocabulary Combination ..., Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Data vs. Process was Re: Vocabulary Combination ..., Miles Sabin
      • Re: Data vs. Process was Re: Vocabulary Combination ..., Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, james anderson
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Tim Bray
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, John Cowan
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, james anderson
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Joe English
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Joe English
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, james anderson
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces, Jonathan Borden
      • Looking for an example of a name colliision, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, John Cowan
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, John Cowan
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, K. Ari Krupnikov
      • Message not available
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, K. Ari Krupnikov
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, Chiusano Joseph
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, W. E. Perry
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, Chiusano Joseph
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, Chiusano Joseph
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, W. E. Perry
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, Chiusano Joseph
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, W. E. Perry
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, Chiusano Joseph
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, Chiusano Joseph
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, K. Ari Krupnikov
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, Bob Foster
      • Re: Looking for an example of a name colliision, Chiusano Joseph
    • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination, james anderson
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Paul Prescod
    • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Paul Prescod
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination, james anderson
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Tim Bray
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Tim Bray
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination, J.Pietschmann
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination, Jason Diamond
      • Re: Vocabulary Combination, MURATA Makoto
• RE: XML Schema and XPointer, Phil Fuhlman
  • RE: XML Schema and XPointer, Shlomo Yona
• RE: Testability and Schema validity, Klotz, Leigh
• should, does, contexts, Simon St.Laurent
• [COOL] Google architecture, Rich Salz
• allow space for an element in xml document which is defined as <xsd:decimal> type in schema, Shital Joshi
• YesLogic Prince 2.0, Michael Day
• [ANN] IPSI-XQ v1.3.0 released, Patrick Lehti
• Xerces-C 2.2.0 problem, tim
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Xerces-C 2.2.0 problem, tim
• [ANN] XML Standards Library 2.0 : Updated 2003-05-27, Tech Support
• Testability and Schema validity, Mike Champion
  • Re: Testability and Schema validity, Arjun Ray
  • Re: Testability and Schema validity, Rick Jelliffe
• Re: XPath Data Model proposal, John Cowan
• RE: Does SAX make sense?, Martin Soukup
  • Re: Does SAX make sense?, Karl Waclawek
    • Re: Does SAX make sense?, zhengyu
      • Re: Does SAX make sense?, Patrick Durusau
      • XML Schema and XPointer, Shlomo Yona
      • Re: Does SAX make sense?, Patrick Durusau
      • Re: Does SAX make sense?, Toni Uusitalo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Does SAX make sense?, Joshua Allen
    • Re: Does SAX make sense?, Patrick Durusau
• Reading specs between the lines( Was: Syntax + object model), AndrewWatt2000
• Only "an" infoset? (Was: Syntax + object model), AndrewWatt2000
• ANN: owl.dtd, Roger L. Costello
  • Re: ANN: owl.dtd, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: ANN: owl.dtd, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: ANN: owl.dtd, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: ANN: owl.dtd, Rick Jelliffe
      • Ordinary (was Re: ANN: owl.dtd), Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Ordinary (was Re: ANN: owl.dtd), Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: ANN: owl.dtd, Arjun Ray
      • Re: ANN: owl.dtd, Jonathan Borden
      • Scary (Re: ANN: owl.dtd), Rick Jelliffe
      • Dogged (Re: ANN: owl.dtd), Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: ANN: owl.dtd, Arjun Ray
      • Re: ANN: owl.dtd, John Cowan
      • Re: ANN: owl.dtd, Arjun Ray
      • Re: ANN: owl.dtd, John Cowan
      • Re: ANN: owl.dtd, Arjun Ray
• Register for SVG Open 2003 Conference by June 13, Philip Mansfield
• Re: Re: Syntax + object model, Linda Grimaldi
  • Re: Re: Syntax + object model, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Re: Syntax + object model, Wendell Piez
    • RE: Re: Syntax + object model, Linda Grimaldi
      • RE: Re: Syntax + object model, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Syntax + object model, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Re: Syntax + object model, Thomas B. Passin
      • RE: Re: Syntax + object model, Linda Grimaldi
      • RE: Re: Syntax + object model, Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: Re: Syntax + object model, Murali Mani
      • Re: Re: Syntax + object model, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Re: Syntax + object model, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Syntax + object model, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Re: Syntax + object model, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Re: Syntax + object model, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Syntax + object model, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Syntax + object model, Bill de hÓra
      • Re: Re: Syntax + object model, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Syntax + object model, Bill de hÓra
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Syntax + object model, Jeff Lowery
    • RE: Syntax + object model, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Syntax + object model, Bill de hÓra
  • RE: Syntax + object model, Dare Obasanjo
  • Re: Syntax + object model, Mike Champion
    • Re: Syntax + object model, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Syntax + object model, Tim Bray
  • RE: Syntax + object model, Joshua Allen
    • RE: Syntax + object model, Simon St.Laurent
    • RE: Syntax + object model, Gustaf Liljegren
  • RE: Syntax + object model, Joshua Allen
    • Re: Syntax + object model, Bill de hÓra
    • RE: Syntax + object model, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Syntax + object model, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Syntax + object model, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Syntax + object model, Arjun Ray
      • Re: Syntax + object model, John Cowan
    • Re: Syntax + object model, Arjun Ray
  • RE: Syntax + object model, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: Syntax + object model, Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: Syntax + object model, Joshua Allen
    • RE: Syntax + object model, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Syntax + object model, Bill de hÓra
    • RE: Syntax + object model, Elliotte Rusty Harold
  • RE: Syntax + object model, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: Re: Syntax + object model, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: Re: Syntax + object model, Murali Mani
      • RE: Re: Syntax + object model, Rich Salz
      • RE: Re: Syntax + object model, Rich Salz
      • Re: Syntax + object model, Arjun Ray
  • RE: Re: Syntax + object model, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: Re: Syntax + object model, Murali Mani
  • RE: Re: Syntax + object model, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: Re: Syntax + object model, Dare Obasanjo
    • RE: Re: Syntax + object model, Murali Mani
    • Re: Re: Syntax + object model, John Cowan
  • RE: Syntax + object model, Dare Obasanjo
  • RE: Syntax + object model, Joshua Allen
  • RE: Syntax + object model, Joshua Allen
  • RE: Syntax + object model, Joshua Allen
    • Re: Syntax + object model, Arjun Ray
    • RE: Syntax + object model, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: Syntax + object model, AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: Syntax + object model, AndrewWatt2000
  • RE: Syntax + object model, Joshua Allen
  • RE: Syntax + object model, Joshua Allen
  • RE: Syntax + object model, Jeff Lowery
• Syntax + object model, Gustaf Liljegren
  • Re: Syntax + object model, Rich Salz
  • Re: Syntax + object model, Gregory Murphy
    • Re: Syntax + object model, Peter Flynn
  • Re: Syntax + object model, Mitch Amiano
  • Re: Syntax + object model, Elliotte Rusty Harold
    • Re: Syntax + object model, Simon St.Laurent
    • RE: Syntax + object model, Linda Grimaldi
• RE: REMOVE !!~#@ IVE TRIED AND YOUR SPAM FILLS UP MY BOX BEFORE CONFIRMATION, Gary Ewen
• Re: REMOVE !!~#@ IVE TRIED AND YOUR SPAM FILLS UP MY BOXBEFORE CONFIRMATION, insanepuppet
• Fwd: YOUR MOTHERS -- oh yeah REMOVE, insanepuppet
  • Re: Fwd: YOUR MOTHERS -- oh yeah REMOVE, Dennis Sosnoski
    • Re: Fwd: YOUR MOTHERS -- oh yeah REMOVE, Jeff Rafter
• BITCHES [expletive deleted] YOUR MOTHERS -- oh yeah REMOVE, insanepuppet
• [expletive deleted] YOU [expletive deleted] YOU [expletive deleted] YOU [expletive deleted] YOU, insanepuppet
• REMOVE !!~#@ IVE TRIED AND YOUR SPAM FILLS UP MY BOX BEFORECONFIRMATION, insanepuppet
• FW: having problems with the "|" in field's element in the xs:key el ement, Jeff Lowery
  • Re: having problems with the "|" in field's element in the xs:key el ement, Bob Foster
• RE: FW: having problems with the "|" in field's element in the xs:key el ement, Jeff Lowery
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: FW: having problems with the "|" in field's element in the xs:key el ement, Bill Riegel
• TrAX passe?, Mike Fitzgerald
  • RE: TrAX passe?, Michael Kay
    • Re: TrAX passe?, Petr Cimprich
• RE: is there a java utility class that can convert between a XML Sche ma dateTime formated string and a java.util.Date or java.sql.TimeStamp, Bill Riegel
• is there a java utility class that can convert between a XML Schema dateTime formated string and a java.util.Date or java.sql.TimeStamp, Bill Riegel
  • Re: is there a java utility class that can convert betweena XML Sche ma dateTime formated string and a java.util.Date or java.sql.TimeStamp, Gregory Murphy
  • Re: is there a java utility class that can convert betweena XML Sche ma dateTime formated string and a java.util.Date or java.sql.TimeStamp, Dennis Sosnoski
• AW: suppression of the transformation of character entities in XSLT?, Sascha Pogacar (XPECT MEDIA)
  • Re: suppression of the transformation of character entities in XSLT?, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: suppression of the transformation of character entities in XSLT?, Mike Fitzgerald
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • AW: suppression of the transformation of character entities in XSLT?, Sascha Pogacar (XPECT MEDIA)
  • AW: suppression of the transformation of character entities in XSLT?, Sascha Pogacar (XPECT MEDIA)
    • RE: suppression of the transformation of character entities in XSLT?, Mike Fitzgerald
      • Re: suppression of the transformation of character entities in XSLT?, Arjun Ray
    • RE: suppression of the transformation of character entities in XSLT?, Michael Kay
  • AW: suppression of the transformation of character entities in XSLT?, Sascha Pogacar (XPECT MEDIA)
  • AW: suppression of the transformation of character entities in XSLT?, Sascha Pogacar (XPECT MEDIA)
• suppression of the transformation of character entities in XSLT?, Sascha Pogacar (XPECT MEDIA)
  • Re: suppression of the transformation of character entities in XSLT?, Bjoern Hoehrmann
  • RE: suppression of the transformation of character entities in XSLT?, Mike Fitzgerald
    • RE: suppression of the transformation of character entitiesin XSLT?, Martin Klang
  • RE: suppression of the transformation of character entities in XSLT?, Michael Kay
  • Re: suppression of the transformation of character entities in XSLT?, S Woodside
    • Re: suppression of the transformation of character entities in XSLT?, Rick Jelliffe
• RE: having problems with the "|" in field's element in the xs:key el ement, Bill Riegel
• ANN: Connect for SQL/XML 2.0, Peter Coppens
• [ANN] alexandra-0.01 available, S Woodside
  • Re: [ANN] alexandra-0.01 available, S Woodside
    • Re: [ANN] alexandra-0.01 available, S Woodside
• Re: [off-topic] xtext -- encoding declarations for text, Klotz, Leigh
  • Re: [off-topic] xtext -- encoding declarations for text, Rick Jelliffe
• RE: Will "AT&T" fit in a string attribute with maxLength="4"?, Zielinski, Marek
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Will "AT&T" fit in a string attribute with maxLength="4"?, Foster, Warwick
    • Re: Will "AT&T" fit in a string attribute with maxLength="4"?, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Will "AT&T" fit in a string attribute with maxLength="4"?, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Will "AT&T" fit in a string attribute with maxLength="4"?, Bob Foster
• Will "AT&T" fit in a string attribute with maxLength="4"?, Zielinski, Marek
  • RE: Will "AT&T" fit in a string attribute with maxLength="4"?, Alessandro Triglia