[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Re: Syntax + object model

• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: RE: Re: Syntax + object model
• From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>
• Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 11:25:38 -0700 (PDT)
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F8064843FB@R...>

Anyways, that is ok. My point is the view given by XPath/XQuery is not
good for all XML documents, especially XML schemas. I do not want to see
an XML schema document in this model, it does not mean anything to me at
all, right??

As I said, I will be very glad to receive an XPath/XQuery to determine
given an XML schema, a tag A, and a tag B, whether B can be a descendant
of A in a valid XML document.

I did mention this when your work was presented at Hong Kong last year by
your colleague, but I will be very glad to see an actual answer to this..

regards - murali.

On Sat, 24 May 2003, Dare Obasanjo wrote:

> I explicitly did not say that. Please reread my post.
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Murali Mani [mailto:mani@C...]
> Sent: Sat 5/24/2003 10:51 AM
> To: Dare Obasanjo
> Cc: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: RE: Re:  Syntax + object model
>
>
>
>
> Dare, I do not think you can say that XPath data model is the standard
> data model for all applications.
>

• References:
  • RE: Re: Syntax + object model
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Syntax + object model
• Next by Date: Re: Syntax + object model
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: Syntax + object model
• Next by thread: RE: Re: Syntax + object model
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread