[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces

• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces
• From: "Seairth Jacobs" <seairth@s...>
• Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 09:45:46 -0400
• References: <ab7bdvs3gol4j4trlefsiq6g4bfbaou70f@4...> <3ED5B096.9080102@t...> <3ED6062E.4080403@b...>

From: "Joe Gregorio" <joe@b...>
> Which is all well and good until you try to embed RSS into another
> vocabulary, for example, SOAP. See [2] for the motivation for this:
>
> <soap:Envelope
>   xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
>   <soap:Header/>
>     <soap:Body>
>       <rss version="2.0">
>         <channel>
>           <title>...

Out of curiousity, what is wrong with the above sample?  The rss elements
are still separate from the soap elements.  If all you had were soap and rss
elements, would it be necessary to namespace-qualify the rss elements?

---
Seairth Jacobs
seairth@s...

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces
    • From: Joe Gregorio <joe@b...>

• References:
  • Vocabulary Combination
    • From: Arjun Ray <aray@n...>
  • Re: Vocabulary Combination
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces
    • From: Joe Gregorio <joe@b...>

• Prev by Date: data definition
• Next by Date: Re: Vocabulary Combination
• Previous by thread: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces
• Next by thread: Re: Vocabulary Combination and optional namespaces
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread