[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Re: Syntax + object model

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Re: Syntax + object model
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 13:15:58 -0400
• In-reply-to: <000001c32217$51c59000$6501a8c0@D89FK411>

grimlinda@e... (Linda Grimaldi) writes:
>I admire your single-mindedness and certainty about the universe- I
>just don't share it.  I'm working on a project now that might use an
>RDF-based ontology for a repository application, and, I think it just
>might work pretty neatly.

I have no certainty whatsoever about the universe.  I find onotologies
to be an approach to making claims of certainty about the universe, a
project I find unfortunate.  XML's sort-of-shared syntax is as far up
the chain of certainty as I find plausible.

>I am short- I hope this doesn't make me a troll...

No, the original claim was here:

http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200305/msg00667.html

Was that a troll?  I don't know.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Syntax + object model
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>
  • RE: Re: Syntax + object model
    • From: Murali Mani <mani@C...>

• References:
  • RE: Re: Syntax + object model
    • From: "Linda Grimaldi" <grimlinda@e...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Syntax + object model
• Next by Date: RE: Re: Syntax + object model
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: Syntax + object model
• Next by thread: RE: Re: Syntax + object model
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread