|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
Re: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working
>There are plenty of areas in these specs that would really benefit from
>detailed review and feedback, but saying "I think I could design a
>better language" is not helpful at this stage.
Unless of course you do design a better language. I think RELAX NG
and JDOM are proofs by example that when a W3C spec goes off the
rails others can and will create better replacements. I suspect this
will happen with XSLT 2 as well as the implementers of XSLT 1 who've
given up in disgust on XSLT 2 and XPath 2 begin to look for something
interesting to do.
Elliotte,
I would be interested to hear more detail of what, specifically, you think has gone wrong with XQuery / XSLT 2.0 / XPath 2.0.
The phrase "given up in disgust" doesn't really convey much detail of what the stumbling blocks are perceived to be and what solutions might be appropriate (and what solutions might be possible).
Which XSLT 1.0 implementers have actually given up?
Andrew Watt
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format
| RSS 2.0 |
 |
| Atom 0.3 |
 |
| |
Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats,
enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.
|
Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website.
they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please
click here.
|
|
Cart
