[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why Standards?

• To: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Subject: Re: Why Standards?
• From: ari@c... (K. Ari Krupnikov)
• Date: 28 May 2003 13:04:03 -0700
• Cc: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.0.20030521142313.0452fae8@n...>
• References: <20030519152736.GB12551@p...><3EC8E25C.7080804@a...><5.2.0.9.0.20030519102416.0365c008@n...><20030519152736.GB12551@p...><5.2.0.9.0.20030521142313.0452fae8@n...>
• Sender: ari@l...
• User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2

I'm catching up on a three-week backlog of xml-dev; please forgive my
late reply.

Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...> writes:

> Also, for many web technologies,
> interoperability matters from the beginning. Perhaps the W3C could
> have waited 5 years to standardize HTML, adopting whatever form of
> HTML succeeded in the free market, but that might have made it
> extremely difficult for smaller vendors and would have resulted in
> huge incompatibilities among browsers.

You must be joking. Are you saying that adherence to W3C HTML Recs is
what would have saved the smaller vendors from the larger one?

Ari.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Why Standards?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Why Standards?
    • From: Adam Turoff <ziggy@p...>
  • Why Standards?
    • From: Jim Ancona <jim@a...>
  • Re: Why Standards?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
  • Re: Why Standards?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Does SAX make sense?
• Next by Date: Vocabulary Combination
• Previous by thread: Re: Image and label placement
• Next by thread: Re: Why Standards?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread