|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Why Standards?
At 08:36 PM 5/20/2003 -0700, Paul Prescod wrote: >Adam Turoff wrote: >>... >>The one thing that *is* clear from Jim Waldo's piece is that premature >>standardization, like premature optimization, is an unnecessary evil in >>this business. > >Fair enough. But when the standard comes too late, a proprietary "de jure" >standard may have an unassailable position in the marketplace. Precisely - this is the main reason that web standards tend to be done in advance of widespread deployment. Also, for many web technologies, interoperability matters from the beginning. Perhaps the W3C could have waited 5 years to standardize HTML, adopting whatever form of HTML succeeded in the free market, but that might have made it extremely difficult for smaller vendors and would have resulted in huge incompatibilities among browsers. Also, note that it can be difficult to bring together a team of experts, including experts from the major software companies, to design something we hope will become a "de facto" standard without doing it under the auspices of a standards body that ensures fair play. Jonathan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








