|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Why Standards?
Adam Turoff wrote: >... > > The one thing that *is* clear from Jim Waldo's piece is that premature > standardization, like premature optimization, is an unnecessary evil in > this business. Fair enough. But when the standard comes too late, a proprietary "de jure" standard may have an unassailable position in the marketplace. If SVG had existed when Flash was invented the Web would be in a much better position than it is. Arguably, SVG came at just the right time technically to build on XML, namespaces, the DOM, etc. But the marketing message is now much more difficult (at least for the subset of its market that could conceivably be served by Flash). One could argue that it would have been better (given 20/20 hindsight and a goal of popularity) to release a technically weaker Web animation specification earlier. That is not, of course, a criticism of anyone in the SVG world. Perhaps it will be better in the long term that they stressed technology rather than timing. Paul Prescod
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








