[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Some random noise on rational type systems for XML


Re:  Some random noise on rational type systems for XML

John Cowan wrote:
> 
> james anderson scripsit:
> > [disonant exchange about types, as to be expected as no distinction was made
> > between lexical and value domains]
> 
> It was just that distinction of which I was availing myself in denying that
> numbers (as opposed to numerals) are a subtype of strings.
> 

it would help if that distinction were made more explicit.

my remark was not directed at the correspondents, but at the universal nature
of discussions about xml.

perhaps, if more care were taken in the multiple megabytes of specifications
issuing from the w3c, this situation would improve.

...

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.