[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: One (jaundiced?) view of Microsoft's vision for XML

• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: RE: One (jaundiced?) view of Microsoft's vision for XML
• From: Ashish Singhal <erashishsinghal@y...>
• Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 22:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F806484395@R...>

Dear Mr. Dare,

I am completely agree with you and I find something
more while using MSXML. MSXML does not provide good
implementation of SAX API like xerces. There are a
number of methods that a developer can use for parsing
 DTDs and Schemas not only validation rather than
MSXML. As far as standards concern Microsoft is also
at good part. 

-Ashish
--- Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...> wrote:
> Taken from
>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/odc_ip2003_ta/html/ODC_InTechOV.asp
>  
> 
> How XML Standards Are Used When Editing a Document
> 
> 
> InfoPath is built from the ground up on XML
> standards, including the following: 
> 
> *	Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 Second
> Edition 
> *	Namespaces in XML 
> *	XML Path Language (XPath) 1.0 
> *	XML Schema (XSD) 1.0 Part 1: Structures, and Part
> 2: Datatypes 
> *	Extensible Stylesheet Language Transformations
> (XSLT) 1.0 
> *	Extensible Hypertext Markup Language (XHTML) 1.0 
> *	Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) 
> *	Document Object Model (DOM) 1.0 
> *	XML Digital Signatures (XML DSig) 
> *	Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) 1.1 
> *	Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1 
> *	Universal Description, Discovery, and Integration
> (UDDI) 1.0 
> 
> It seems no matter how many open standards Microsoft
> adopts across its products and developer
> technologies, there's always someone willing to
> complain that their pet standard hasn't been
> adopted. Just goes to show you can't please
> everyone. 
> 
>  
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Simon St.Laurent
> [mailto:simonstl@s...]
> Sent: Thu 5/15/2003 5:26 AM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  One (jaundiced?) view of
> Microsoft's vision for XML
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> It might be nice if MSFT had adopted open standards
> all the way up their
> XML stack, but I'm reasonably content that they are
> using more open
> standards than they used to support.  Thanks to
> toolkits that are widely
> available, I can take their pileup and produce
> something that's
> comfortable for me to use.
> 
> --
> Simon St.Laurent
> Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
> Errors, errors, all fall down!
> http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
> 
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org
> <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at
> http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the
> subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org
> <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at
> http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the
> subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com

• References:
  • RE: One (jaundiced?) view of Microsoft's vision for XML
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Why XML?
• Next by Date: Re: DAML +OIL versus XML
• Previous by thread: Re: One (jaundiced?) view of Microsoft's vision for XML
• Next by thread: RE: One (jaundiced?) view of Microsoft's vision for XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread