RE: Ten new XQuery, XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 Working Drafts
> -----Original Message----- > From: bry@i... [mailto:bry@i...] > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 2:16 PM > To: Dare Obasanjo > Cc: xml-dev@l... > > That said I'm sure you've probably gone over the many ways > that concerns about xslt 2.0 dependencies is so much > irrational FUD in some other post in the past, can you send > me the link so I don't have to google all over for your > response? I haven't because no one has given any technical reasons for their complaints besides dislike of W3C XML Schema or the fact that W3C XML Schema has a lot more primitive types than they expected. There really isn't much of a response one can make to comments like those. > As an aside you seem to be of two minds on this > irrational FUD, as you characterize it, as you claim that > aside from that you have not seen any valid issues brought > up, implying that you also see it as something of a valid issue. Negative perception of the language regardless of whether it is founded on fact or not is a valid issue. -- PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM Mincing your words is a good thing because you may have to eat them later. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format