[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: DAML +OIL versus XML

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: DAML +OIL versus XML
• From: Linda Grimaldi <grimlinda@e...>
• Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 11:43:43 -0600 (MDT)

Very well put- you can serialize just about anything as XML.  That doesn't mean it IS XML.

Linda

As long as you think of RDF as being XML what you see
is the syntax, and not the model. If people could only realize that
the two have very little to do with one another things would be a lot
easier. 

-- 
Lars Marius Garshol, Ontopian         <URL: <a target=_blank
href="http://www.ontopia.net">http://www.ontopia.net</a> >
GSM: +47 98 21 55 50                  <URL: <a target=_blank
href="http://www.garshol.priv.no">http://www.garshol.priv.no</a> >


-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at <a target=_blank
href="http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/">http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/</a>

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

> 

• Prev by Date: RE: key constraint question
• Next by Date: ANN: Call for Submissions for XML 2003
• Previous by thread: Re: DAML +OIL versus XML
• Next by thread: key constraint question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread