[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Syntax + object model

• To: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• Subject: Re: Syntax + object model
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 18:45:09 +0100
• Cc: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <4827EC373E03DB44AC2AB3900430896B67227D@c...>
• Organization: Propylon
• References: <4827EC373E03DB44AC2AB3900430896B67227D@c...>
• Reply-to: bill.dehora@p...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312

Jeff Lowery wrote:

> Hashmaps, arrays, red-black trees, dictionaries, etc. all operate on pretty
> much the same principles (at least in the OO languages) regardless of the
> actual language they're implemented in.  

Oh sure, but have you tried moving them around (even only amongst OO 
languages)? Perhaps this is ungenerous, but sharing basic data 
structures seems to be something of a continuing research project in WS.

Bill de hÓra
--
Propylon
www.propylon.com

• References:
  • RE: Syntax + object model
    • From: Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: Syntax + object model
• Next by Date: Re: Syntax + object model
• Previous by thread: RE: Syntax + object model
• Next by thread: RE: Syntax + object model
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread