[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Does SAX make sense?

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Does SAX make sense?
• From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@l...>
• Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 14:45:16 +0200
• In-reply-to: <3ED49D15.7000608@e...>
• References: <87609AFB433BD5118D5E0002A52CD7540453A35A@z...><000e01c3232a$940526b0$0207a8c0@karl><014601c324f2$51b4e100$483aea0c@a...>

I think some kind of "xpath helpers" or similar for SAX would be useful for 
many situations, maybe there's
need for some SAX evolution (v.3?), not necessarily new object model since 
SAX has been said to be
"the most complete XML API around".

What I mean is that one shoudn't "hastily" hide SAX API behind some state 
machine compiler for example,
but provide helper methods for dealing with states etc.

But well, sometimes we have to vote for THE LEAST CORRUPTED leader.
(they said something like this in tv when talking about/analysing 
Argentine's president election!) ;)



Toni Uusitalo

"The only constant thing is change."

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.6.3i

mQBNAzRFXRgAAAECAJMkForYIQ44inQgCRWQvwKPvC+YrLj7EZR+4fbM830Lm5ul
4sQQ6q/yYjx5tNXpvCsMt6SAf/DvxqLEw5LMmX0ABRG0LFRvbmkgTS4gVXVzaXRh
bG8gPHRvbml1dUB3YWxydXMubWVnYWJhdWQuZmk+iQBVAwUQNEVdGMaixMOSzJl9
AQErZQH/WJsfLX2oLepO6hURb/r2ermh0DhIqVxXHdxzVTRd9nEcF+9I+XeNs9Nh
Cnsec0qQjZALPDpqPEg/JtQQvIcehA==
=76V5
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- 

• References:
  • RE: Does SAX make sense?
    • From: "Martin Soukup" <martin@d...>
  • Re: Does SAX make sense?
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>
  • Re: Does SAX make sense?
    • From: "zhengyu" <zhengyu@a...>
  • Re: Does SAX make sense?
    • From: Patrick Durusau <pdurusau@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Does SAX make sense?
• Next by Date: RE: XML Schema and XPointer
• Previous by thread: Re: Does SAX make sense?
• Next by thread: RE: Does SAX make sense?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread