|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: (data) medium is the message
Hunsberger, Peter wrote: > Mitch Amiano <mamiano@n...> writes: <snip/> >>the *intent* is divergent. Well, the intent is mostly >>informal, unspecified, and floating free. <snip/> > I believe it is mostly possible to automatically reverse engineer a given > language (say Java or C++) into a UML representation? At that point you've > got abstractions which it seems are pretty much well defined and self > contained? You're right that you can't then map this to any arbitrary I've seen engineering teams waste years trying to get reverse engineering right. > pre-existing schema, but I don't see what is stopping you from generating a > new relational schema that can store all the given objects and their > attributes? Certainly Java CMP is one example of this (albeit perhaps an > ugly one). Maybe this gets back to the normalization issue: the result may > not fit with what a best practices relational model would look like, but it > should still work? Whether it will work for a given situation is beyond this discussion, but we do seem to be moving more and more toward technologies that allow one-off deployment. > <snip/> >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








