[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: (data) medium is the message

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: (data) medium is the message
• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
• Date: Sat, 03 May 2003 01:10:11 -0400
• References: <601F6322AD71D5118D6C00034725152910FF2486@s...>

[Hunsberger, Peter]
>
> For the way most people practice use case I'd have to agree with you.
> However, there is a school of thought (which we ascribe to and attempt to
> practice) that takes use case to a lot lower levels and a lot more detail
> while simultaneously embellishing it with simple class and activity
diagrams
> that certainly doesn't trivialize anything.
>

Then there is Ian Graham's (and no the OPEN consortium's) use of
"scenarios", which takes use cases the other way - makes them more like
generic use cases.

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • RE: (data) medium is the message
    • From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter.Hunsberger@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: King Canute (was: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?))
• Next by Date: Re: Extreme Schema-building and Query-writing (was Re: (data) medium is the message)
• Previous by thread: RE: (data) medium is the message
• Next by thread: RE: (data) medium is the message
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread