|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Only "an" infoset? (Was: Syntax + object model)
In a message dated 25/05/2003 09:43:56 GMT Daylight Time, cowan@m... writes: Arjun Ray scripsit: John, Doesn't the W3C XML Information Set Recommendation only define "an" infoset? Since the Rec explicitly eschews being "exhaustive" ... by which I take it to mean it acknowledges not being complete (anticipated usefulness is the expressed criterion for inclusion)... then surely what the Rec defines is only *an* infoset? In the other direction the PSVI is a different kind of infoset, so demonstrating that the Infoset is only *an* infoset. Wouldn't you agree? Of course all that assumes that we know / can agree on what an infoset is in the first place. :) Andrew Watt "An infoset means what I intend it to mean, no more and no less." after Humpty Dumpty.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








