|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home]
[By Thread]
[By Date]
[Recent Entries]
[Reply To This Message]
XML-DEV Mailing List Archive by thread - December, 2001
- [Ann] Project Labrador,
Tom Bradford
- Re: Packaging (was Re: Interoperability),
adam souzis
- RE: The Two Poles of the XML World (was RE: W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates),
Champion, Mike
- The Two Poles of the XML World (was RE: W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates),
Champion, Mike
- qname resolution question,
Takuki Kamiya
- RE: Font Verdana,
Scherpenzeel, Wim
- Font Verdana,
Raúl Carazo
- RE: W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates,
Champion, Mike
- Is there XML Schema for XSLT?,
Takuki Kamiya
- Q. about 'DOM-Hash-total',
Scherpenzeel, Wim
- RE: XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated,
Naren Chawla
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated,
Champion, Mike
- RE: XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated,
Champion, Mike
- RE: XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated,
Champion, Mike
- RE: XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated,
Champion, Mike
- RE: XML "tuple spaces" alpha technology demonstrated,
Champion, Mike
- RE: uncle! XHTML Basic and validation,
Michael Brennan
- RE: W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates,
Champion, Mike
- Re: XML, Java, & filters question...,
Niels Peter Strandberg
- Re: XML Schema and Timezones,
s.livingstone
- XML Schema and Timezones,
s.livingstone
- XML-based text editor: a proposal,
Dmitry Kirsanov
- Announce: JaxMe Java/XML,
Wiedmann, Jochen
- SV: W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Stil l missing Updates,
Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI
- SV: W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates,
Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI
- Re: SV: SV: W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates,
Jonathan Robie
- RE: W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates,
Champion, Mike
- RE: W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts - Still missing Updates,
Champion, Mike
uncle! XHTML Basic and validation,
Jonathan Borden
ANN: Gorille (alpha),
Simon St.Laurent
Announcement: W3C's five new XQuery/Xpath2 working drafts,
Massimo Marchiori
XML - XML Transformations,
Vanam, Ravindar
XML, Java, & filters question...,
Cubeta, James
XML & Java question...,
Cubeta, James
RE: Goodbye to textual applications?,
John Evdemon
RE: Recently published W3C Working Drafts (long),
Michael Rys
Bounds Specification,
Sameet Nasnodkar
NULL in C (was RE: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?),
Michael Rys
Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX,,
Uche Ogbuji
RE: Namespace Usage Question,
Michael Brennan
Xerces 2.0.0 - DocumentType.getInternalSubset() does it work?!,
Cirip Tomas
Recently published W3C Working Drafts,
Joe English
RE: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?,
Derek Denny-Brown
RE: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?,
Michael Rys
- Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?,
Tim Bray
- Re: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?,
Rick Jelliffe
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?,
Champion, Mike
RE: Supporting Unicode,
Nicolas LEHUEN
RE: Lexical vs value spaces (re: Binary content and allowed characters in XML),
Nicolas LEHUEN
RE: embedded html,
Bart.Boogaerts
embedded html,
Bart.Boogaerts
Binary content and allowed characters in XML,
Nicolas LEHUEN
Time to put SGML out to pasture? (was RE: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?),
Champion, Mike
- Re: Time to put SGML out to pasture?,
Joe English
- Re: Goodbye to textual applications?,
Andrew Kuchling
- Re: Goodbye to textual applications?,
Amy Lewis
- Re: Goodbye to textual applications?,
John Cowan
- Re: Goodbye to textual applications?,
Adam Turoff
- Re: Goodbye to textual applications?,
John Cowan
- Re: Goodbye to textual applications?,
Marcus Carr
- Re: Goodbye to textual applications?,
Sean McGrath
- Re: Goodbye to textual applications?,
Paul T
- Re: Goodbye to textual applications?,
Sean McGrath
- Re: Goodbye to textual applications?,
Paul T
- Re: Goodbye to textual applications?,
Joe English
- Re: Goodbye to textual applications?,
Paul T
- IBTWSH in RNG (was: Goodbye to textual applications?),
John Cowan
- Re: Time to put SGML out to pasture? (was RE: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?),
Simon St.Laurent
- Re: Time to put SGML out to pasture? (was RE: Why would MS want to make XML break on UNIX, Perl, Python, etc ?),
Marcus Carr
RE: Supporting Unicode (was Some comments on the 1.1 draft),
Rob Griffin
Graphotron - XPath based generation of graphs from XML documents,
Miloslav Nic
Re: XML Stream in C++,
Pete Kirkham
hierarchy,
Fabien Roy
convertin XML to RTF using java api,
Selvamani
Namespace Usage Question,
Clark C . Evans
WebSphere tool development trial version - heavy on XML,
Jeffrey I Condon
RE: s-expressions and XML was Re: terra incog nita,
Jeff Lowery
XTC Project,
HIRAUCHI Hideyuki
XML Stream in C++,
Pijcke Christophe
RE: Impact of Various Features on W3C Schema Design,
CHIUSANO, Joseph
Deadline extended for XML Europe paper submissions!,
Elledge, Marion
Impact of Various Features on W3C Schema Design,
CHIUSANO, Joseph
RE: s-expressions and XML was Re: terra incognita,
Champion, Mike
RE: URI for class names and native data types,
Nicolas LEHUEN
SPKI-XML Certificate Structure,
Xavier Orri
RE: DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator,
Jeff Lowery
RE: XML Validation Tool using MS XML 4,
Joshua Allen
URI for class names and native data types,
Clark C . Evans
DESIGN PROPOSAL: Java XMLIterator,
John Cowan
XML Validation Tool using MS XML 4,
Badri Lakshmiraghavan
Regex for XPath schema type?,
Amy Lewis
RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Joshua Allen
- RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Julian Reschke
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
David Brownell
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Michael Rys
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Alan Kent
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Julian Reschke
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Rick Jelliffe
- RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Julian Reschke
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Eric van der Vlist
- RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Julian Reschke
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Julian Reschke
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Julian Reschke
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Julian Reschke
- WebDAV (was Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft),
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: WebDAV (was Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft),
Julian Reschke
- Re: WebDAV (was Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft),
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: WebDAV (was Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft),
Julian Reschke
- RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Michael Kay
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
MURATA Makoto
- RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Michael Rys
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Alan Kent
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Alan Kent
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
John Cowan
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
John Cowan
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Richard Tobin
- Supporting Unicode (was Some comments on the 1.1 draft),
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Supporting Unicode (was Some comments on the 1.1 draft),
John Cowan
- Re: Supporting Unicode (was Some comments on the 1.1 draft),
Peter S. Housel
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
John Cowan
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Rick Jelliffe
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
John Cowan
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
J C Theriot
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Eric van der Vlist
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
John Cowan
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Michael Rys
- RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Michael Rys
- RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Michael Rys
- Re: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Michael Rys
- RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft,
Michael Rys
|
Cart