RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft
> and hopefully, as characters in our email I don't think technology will block that so much as the curmudgeonly people who flame anyone who dares send e-mail in such new-fangled encodings as HTML. If we have had HTML for ten years and people still get scorched for sending it in e-mail, I don't have very high hopes for any further evolution in e-mail encoding capabilities. Even in 2007, when the majority of the Internet communicates in Chinese utf-16, I bet Western Europe will still be arguing about whether or not e-mail should allow XML. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Kay [mailto:michael.h.kay@n...] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:58 AM To: 'Richard Tobin'; xml-dev@l... Subject: RE: Some comments on the 1.1 draft > XPath and probably some other languages rely on digits not being > name starts for their tokenizing.Â Compare a[b] and a. > > I think it would be a mistake to change the name-start status of any > of the standard ASCII characters. > I have been looking forward to the day when we could break away from the ASCII legacy and start using characters such as Â Â§, Â¬, Ã?, Ã·, â??, and â?© as operators in our programming languages (and hopefully, as characters in our email). I hope XML 1.1 will not kill these hopes. Mike Kay
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format