Re: XML and mainframes, yet again (was RE: Somecomme
David Carlisle scripsit: > And you can even do that if you specify an ibm encoding and the > parser does the "obvious" thing with NEL and maps it to #10 > (whilst it is arguable that the mapping for NEL should be 85 which then > wouldn't work without xml 1.1 , this is dubious, it is clearly less > useful and it seems unnatural, one assumes that other text transfers > (eg ftp) between ibm and the ascii world map line to line ends, so it > see,s unreasonable that the mapping for xml should map ibm new lines to > #85 which isn't a line end in any ascii/unicode system and is just > presumably there to allow some kind of round tripping. And what is to be done with ASCII-encoded IBM plain text, which actually uses 85 to represent #x85? -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@c... Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format