[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Nasty XPath expressions

Re:  Nasty XPath expressions
> XPath says that nodes should be returned in 'document order', which
> becomes a non-trivial in the case of some expressions involving
> the union operator.

Actually, XPath nowhere says that nodes must be returned in document order.
Node-sets are sets; they have no order. Whether you want to subsequently
process the nodes in document order or not is up to the external framework
(e.g. XSLT). I could certainly imagine frameworks that don't require
document-order processing. In the end, the distinction isn't all that
helpful, because XPath alone doesn't define any conformance requirements.
There is no required (or specified) behavior for an XPath processor, because
XPath just defines abstract objects rather than implementable behavior.

Evan Lenz
XYZFind Corp.


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.