[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: uncle! XHTML Basic and validation


xmnls
> From: Jonathan Borden [mailto:jborden@m...]

<snip/>
 
> How should this be resolved:
> 
> 1) don't use XHTML Basic (or any XHTML modularization)
> 2) require all documents to be prefixed even those that don't 
> have XHTML
> content.
> 3) require all content to have explicit xmnls="...xhtml..." 
> declarations.
> 4) give up and move to XML schemas

I'd go for choice 4, though I'd use the term "XML schemas" rather broadly to
include any namespace-aware schema language, not just W3C XML Schema.

DTDs and namespaces just don't mix well.

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.