RE: uncle! XHTML Basic and validation
> From: Jonathan Borden [mailto:jborden@m...] <snip/> > How should this be resolved: > > 1) don't use XHTML Basic (or any XHTML modularization) > 2) require all documents to be prefixed even those that don't > have XHTML > content. > 3) require all content to have explicit xmnls="...xhtml..." > declarations. > 4) give up and move to XML schemas I'd go for choice 4, though I'd use the term "XML schemas" rather broadly to include any namespace-aware schema language, not just W3C XML Schema. DTDs and namespaces just don't mix well.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format