Re: Namespace Usage Question
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:34:57AM +0000, Richard Tobin wrote: | >I did some searching for publicly known namespaces | >(schema in particular) which use the flexibility of | >URI references by either being non-absolute or having | >a fragment. | | You should note that relative namespace URIs are illegal (surely this | debate cannot have been forgotten?). See http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xppa | for details. Thanks Richard. I am aware that relative namespace URIs are deprecated; however, they are still well-formed XML and conform to the namespaces spec (to be addressed in XML version 1.1?). In any case, I'd still like to know if anyone is still using them (a year and a half later). Furthermore (and more importantly), I'm interested to know if URI fragments are being used by any mainstream processes or schema. In particular, case "B" as given by the previous question... B. xmlns:foo="http://somehost/somepath#fragment" Thanks so much! Best, Clark -- Clark C. Evans Axista, Inc. http://www.axista.com 800.926.5525 XCOLLA Collaborative Project Management Software
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format